Science Standards w00t!!!11!!
I've moved to Substack. Come join me there.
1 week ago in Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
Discussions on the interface between Science and Society, Politics, Religion, Life, and whatever else I decide to write about.
2 comments:
My first comment (compliment) is that the format of the standards is more clear and readable than the 2003 version. The second, is a thanks for preventing any sort of ambiguity on the use of the word "evolution" in the life science strands.
Mike, the compliments are appreciated.
Full disclosure, the compliments regarding the format belong to much more organized people than me. But I am sure they will appreciate them, I know the core writers worked hard to try and get things as clear and well put together as possible. (Here's hoping a frameworks document gets completed as well to provide some guidance for school districts and teachers.)
Regarding evolution, that was an interesting story that occurred over the year of working on the standards. Well, it probably isnt that interesting, but it is a story.
Post a Comment