- Home
- Angry by Choice
- Catalogue of Organisms
- Chinleana
- Doc Madhattan
- Games with Words
- Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
- History of Geology
- Moss Plants and More
- Pleiotropy
- Plektix
- RRResearch
- Skeptic Wonder
- The Culture of Chemistry
- The Curious Wavefunction
- The Phytophactor
- The View from a Microbiologist
- Variety of Life
Field of Science
-
-
-
Political pollsters are pretending they know what's happening. They don't.1 month ago in Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
-
-
Course Corrections6 months ago in Angry by Choice
-
-
The Site is Dead, Long Live the Site2 years ago in Catalogue of Organisms
-
The Site is Dead, Long Live the Site2 years ago in Variety of Life
-
Does mathematics carry human biases?4 years ago in PLEKTIX
-
-
-
-
A New Placodont from the Late Triassic of China5 years ago in Chinleana
-
Posted: July 22, 2018 at 03:03PM6 years ago in Field Notes
-
Bryophyte Herbarium Survey7 years ago in Moss Plants and More
-
Harnessing innate immunity to cure HIV8 years ago in Rule of 6ix
-
WE MOVED!8 years ago in Games with Words
-
-
-
-
post doc job opportunity on ribosome biochemistry!9 years ago in Protein Evolution and Other Musings
-
Growing the kidney: re-blogged from Science Bitez9 years ago in The View from a Microbiologist
-
Blogging Microbes- Communicating Microbiology to Netizens10 years ago in Memoirs of a Defective Brain
-
-
-
The Lure of the Obscure? Guest Post by Frank Stahl12 years ago in Sex, Genes & Evolution
-
-
Lab Rat Moving House13 years ago in Life of a Lab Rat
-
Goodbye FoS, thanks for all the laughs13 years ago in Disease Prone
-
-
Slideshow of NASA's Stardust-NExT Mission Comet Tempel 1 Flyby13 years ago in The Large Picture Blog
-
in The Biology Files
Discussions on the interface between Science and Society, Politics, Religion, Life, and whatever else I decide to write about.
The Joys of Science
This is why soft skinned people should not be in science. In the last week I have had 2 papers rejected from top-tiered journals and of the 4 abstracts submitted from my laboratory to a national meeting, exactly 0 were chosen for oral presentations. Too bad I don't have a grant under review right now, I could go for the trifecta.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
But I thought if you where a "darwinist" the money, fame and POWER. Just came roling in. I mean Ben Stien would not lie, would he?
Well the Power and money does come rolling in, but being a liberal I am unable to save and invest so I waste all the money. We don't do fame, rather we like to exert our control of the universe from the shadows. Oh and the power comes from a mouse on an exercise wheel, so we can't waste it.
I really don't understand people's obsession with being selected for oral presentations. Being taken seriously by the field is nice but useful scientific discussion is at the poster session..
I really don't understand people's obsession with being selected for oral presentations. Being taken seriously by the field is nice but useful scientific discussion is at the poster session.
Agreed that useful discussion happens at the poster. However, here are some reasons why I do care:
1. the oral presentation gives you the entire audience (our meeting is not divided into sub-sections), thus at the bar, during posters, etc. everyone knows who you are and will engage you in discussion. This includes people who may not have been interested in your abstract per say and were not coming to your poster.
2. Its good advertising for my laboratory, if I (or one of mine) gives a good talk, it is good advertising to recruit good post-docs, which is tough to do in the Midwest, to give favorable impressions to likely grant reviewers, to get invitations to give seminars, etc. All of these things are important for tenure and promotion decisions since you need outside letters.
3. Its good for my laboratory members, pads the CV, and more importantly advertises them to top labs in pursuit of post-doc positions or faculty positions.
There's 3 easy answers to why I am obsessed with oral presentations. But I agree the quality of the science is not affected by oral-poster presentations nor the potential to establish collaborations.
Post a Comment